Skip to main content
Back to Tools

Engineering Tool · Treatment Process Design

Ozone Dosing & CT Screening

Size the ozone generator for a target applied dose, then run a preliminary CT comparison using water temperature, generic baffling, and residual inputs.

Municipal Drinking WaterStage 04 Stage 05
Status
Live Engineering Tool
Modes
Dosing / CT screening
Conditions
Temperature / baffling / residual
Units
Metric
ATLAS WTS · Process Engineering

Ozone Dosing & CT Calculator

Size the ozone generator for a target applied dose, then run a preliminary CT screen for the contact basin.

General Info

Dosing & Generator Sizing

Typical for a well-designed venturi/fine-bubble injection system: 85-95%. Older or poorly-matched systems can run materially lower (50-70%) — confirm against actual equipment/injector performance data.

Dosing Results
Preliminary CT Screening

CT Results
EPA 40 CFR §141.720(b)(2) Reference Table — Ozone CT Screening (mg·min/L)

Values shown are the published reference table at the 6 temperatures below; this preliminary screen uses the printed continuous equation for the exact entered temperature. Generic baffling is not an approved contact-time basis, so the result is not a regulatory determination.

Powered by ATLAS WTS

01

Engineering Basis

Methodology

CT compliance follows the official US EPA Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (40 CFR §141.720(b)(2)) Cryptosporidium ozone CT table, evaluated via its own sanctioned continuous equation — Log credit = (0.0397 × 1.09757^Temp) × CT — which reproduces the published table exactly at every tabulated temperature. T10 is computed as hydraulic retention time (contact volume ÷ flow) times a baffling factor from the standard EPA/AWWA contact-basin classification (0.1 unbaffled to 0.7 superior).

Theoretical ozone rate (g/h) equals flow (m³/h) times target applied dose (mg/L) — dimensionally exact, since 1 mg/L applied across 1 m³/h is 1 gram of ozone per hour. Required generator output divides that rate by the transfer efficiency of the injection/contact system, since not all generated ozone dissolves into the water — typical well-designed systems achieve 85-95%, and this should be confirmed against actual equipment performance.

Standards / Reference Basis

40 CFR §141.720(b)(2)EPA/AWWA contact-basin baffling reference

Assumptions

  • CT is estimated as hydraulic retention time multiplied by a generic baffling factor.
  • The screening uses the entered water temperature, baffling factor, and residual.

Scope / Limitations

  • This is a preliminary CT screen; generic baffling is not a regulatory compliance basis.
  • No approved contact-time/residual basis is included, so the screen cannot determine regulatory compliance.
02

Engineering Path

Scenario

Workflow