Live Engineering Tool

Cooling Tower Water Balance & LSI Calculator

A vendor-neutral evaporation, drift, blowdown, and makeup water balance calculator for industrial cooling towers, paired with a Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) and Ryznar Stability Index (RSI) model that dynamically flags scaling and corrosion risk in the circulating water.

Design Reference Ranges

Langelier (1936)CTI / ASHRAE Mass BalanceVendor-Neutral

Need a custom review?

For non-standard makeup water chemistry, closed-loop systems, or a full scale/corrosion control program, our engineers can provide a detailed process audit.

Request Consultation

Export Capabilities

  • Professional PDF engineering reports
  • Combined water balance + LSI/RSI record
  • Metric / Imperial unit conversion
  • Makeup-water-to-circulating-water estimation
ATLAS WTS · Process Engineering

Cooling Tower Water Balance & LSI Calculator

Evaporation, drift, blowdown and makeup water balance from mass conservation, plus Langelier Saturation Index scaling/corrosion risk screening for the circulating water.

Local Engine
Project Information
Heat Load & Water Balance

Cooling range (ΔT): —

Typical operating range: 3–6.

Default 0.00153 (metric, m³/h & °C basis) — see methodology note below. Typical range 0.00115–0.00195 for climate variation.

Circulating Water Chemistry (for LSI)
Estimate from Makeup Water Optional

If you only have makeup water lab data on hand, enter it here and estimate the concentrated circulating-water values (Ca, Alkalinity, TDS all scale × CoC at steady state). pH does not scale this way — enter your own circulating water pH reading above.

Water Balance Results
Evaporation Loss (E)
m³/h
E = k × Flow × ΔT
Drift Loss (D)
m³/h
Blowdown Required (B)
m³/h
B = E/(CoC−1) − D
Total Makeup Water (M)
m³/h
M = E + D + B

Achieved CoC: —

Heat rejected (informational): —

Scaling & Corrosion Risk (LSI)
Enter circulating water chemistry to evaluate scaling/corrosion risk.
Saturation pH (pHs)
Langelier Saturation Index
LSI = pH − pHs
Ryznar Stability Index
RSI = 2×pHs − pH
Design Notes & Warnings

Export includes the current water balance and water chemistry configuration and results.

Evaporation coefficient: the commonly cited "0.0008/0.00085 × flow × range" rule of thumb is an imperial constant (gpm, °F) — used directly against a Celsius ΔT without the required ×1.8 unit conversion it understates evaporation by roughly 1.8×. This tool defaults to the converted metric constant, 0.00153, cross-checked against the independent "~1% evaporation per 5.6°C range" industry rule of thumb.

Engineering Methodology

Evaporation, drift, and blowdown follow a standard mass-conservation water balance (CTI/ASHRAE convention): evaporation loss is proportional to circulating flow x cooling range, drift loss follows the selected drift eliminator performance class, and forced blowdown is solved directly from a steady-state Cycles of Concentration mass balance.

Scaling/corrosion tendency uses the Langelier Saturation Index (Langelier, 1936) computed from water temperature, pH, calcium hardness, total alkalinity, and TDS, with the Ryznar Stability Index included as a secondary cross-check — both are empirical screening indices, not a substitute for a full water treatment chemical program.

Related Tools in This Process

Industrial water treatment tools rarely work in isolation — see how this calculator connects to the rest of the treatment train.

Related Technical Reading

Deepen your understanding of the engineering behind this tool.

Process Equipment

Oversized Process Equipment in Industrial Water Treatment: Why Safety Margins Become Hidden Life-Cycle Costs

Stacked safety factors on pumps, blowers, membranes, and tanks don't just raise the purchase price — they push equipment out of its efficient operating window for years. A life-cycle model built on a real MBR retrofit shows a phased, right-sized design beating a one-time oversized build by roughly 10%, even when the deferred expansion eventually happens.

Read Article
Zero Liquid Discharge & Brine Concentration

Zero Liquid Discharge Is a Sequencing Problem: Why the Membrane-to-Thermal Handoff Point Is the Real Design Decision

Most ZLD comparisons pit MVR against MEE against membrane distillation as if picking one settles the design. The bigger lever is upstream: every extra point of recovery a membrane train squeezes out before handoff removes disproportionate capital and energy from whatever thermal step comes after it.

Read Article
Steam-Water Cycle Chemistry & Corrosion Control

Steam-Water Cycle Chemistry: Why Trace Impurities Get Amplified a Million-Fold Before They Ever Reach a Turbine Blade

A few micrograms per kilogram of the wrong ion shouldn't matter in a system running thousands of tonnes of water an hour. It matters anyway, because boiling and phase change concentrate that trace impurity by up to a million times right at the metal surface — which is why cycle chemistry regime choice, not routine water testing, is what actually prevents flow-accelerated corrosion.

Read Article